The Seven Sections Are:
The "Nikon SP Reissue Model" (hereinafter referred to as the SP reissue) is a reissue of the highest achievement of rangefinder cameras, the Nikon SP that went on sale in 1957 (Showa 33). This was to be the second challenge at a Nikon S series camera after the Nikon S3 2000 Limited Edition "Millennium" model that went on sale in 2000. The Nikon SP became a legend, loved by many photojournalists and photographers for its high precision, smooth operation, and exceptional durability. After the "S3 Reissue Model" went
on sale, we received requests from many Nikon fans to reissue the SP.
![]() Nikon SP Reissue Model ![]() Certificate of Authenticity |
||||||||
Motivation to Aim Even Higher Although Mito Nikon proved their skill in reissuing the S3, as time passed by they became less and less satisfied with their achievement. This was because of the motivation of Mito Nikon's engineers to aim even higher. Their motivation focused on the camera that was called the "the highest pinnacle" of rangefinder cameras, the Nikon SP. When the Nikon S series reissue project officially started in 1998, the finder was considered "impossible" to recreate and the idea was given up, so this motivation represented the desire to try to manufacture that extremely complicated and elaborate universal finder. Certainly, the road to reissuing the S3, with its intricate construction and beautiful exterior, was full of challenges and difficulties. However, the engineers chose the S3 first, and their success gave them confidence. We can recreate that universal finder! As more time passed, the Mito Nikon engineers began to feel that they had received enough feedback. The fact that the S3 Reissue Model was received far better than expected also helped to encourage them. One Year After the S3 Reissue - Already Movement Under the Surface According to Mito Nikon's records, they began collecting information on the SP in July 2001, one year after the S3 Reissue Model started shipping. The following August, some staff members went into a used camera store in the Ginza, Tokyo and purchased two original SP bodies. They also managed to get the original technical drawings from Nikon, and although a project team had not even been formed yet, starting with an inspection of the universal finder, the SP reissue project was already making steady progress under the surface. After that, in September 2002 Nikon authorized the Nikon SP Reissue project, thus giving the Mito Nikon engineers the official "green light". As with the S3 reissue, Mito Nikon would manufacture the body, and Tochigi Nikon would manufacture the lens and prism components in the finder along with the W-Nikkor 3.5cm F1.8 lens that would be sold as part of the set. With Nikon Photo Products Inc. taking charge of sales, the project officially started. Photo caption: ![]() Original SP diagrams |
||||||||
We Don't Know How the Finder is Assembled The
difference in the number of components between the SP and S3 was very clear.
The SP consisted of 895 components compared to the S3's 816 components.
Just looking at the lenses and prisms of the finders alone, the S3 consisted
of
13 parts compared to the SP's 28 parts and extremely complicated construction. However, by disassembling
the SPs purchased at the used camera store, and by actually carefully examining
each component, Mito Nikon worked
out the
finder's construction and determined that it could be manufactured using
modern techniques. With the techniques required to manufacture the S3
reissue already sorted, motivation to manufacture the SP reissue grew even
more.
However, Mito Nikon didn't know how such a complex finder was assembled
back in the days of the original SP. The assembly procedure
of the finder was basically the process of following the diagrams included
in the technical drawings, but there was
no notes
at all concerning the actual assembly process. Just by looking at the
diagrams, it was impossible to even imagine what part of the finder should
be used
as the reference point. And to make matters worse, after disassembling
them,
the two original SPs purchased at a used camera store turned out to be
slightly different from each other and were no help at all in determining
the reference
point. In the end, Mito
Nikon developed their own machines to use collimators and lasers and used
these machines
to increase the accuracy of optical
axis
adjustments and decrease production time. However, because so much
finicky hands-on work was necessary, there was still no change in the fact
that
it took considerable time to assemble and adjust the finder. However, this improvement in optical performance created a problem. Light now traveled so smoothly that it created unexpected ghosting in the visible part of the finder. Ghosting was caused by even the slightest of misalignments between the prisms embedded in the finder. To prevent this ghosting, after trial and error, some of the prisms that comprised the finder were shaved by extremely small amounts by hand. This was extremely difficult work involving minute adjustments of only 0.2mm or less. If a prism was shaved too much, the overall optical performance was adversely affected. Furthermore, to
prevent light from reflecting in and having an adverse affect, the corners
of the prisms were painted by
brush with ink.
This was a highly
skilled manual task that only experts can perform. It also took
time to determine the
correct colors for the frames used in the finder. On the right
side of the reissue "husband and wife" finder
the 5cm and 8.5cm frames are white, the 10.5cm frame is yellow, and
the 13.5cm frame is red, but because the colors in original SP finders
have faded with
age, we don't know what the real original colors were. We do know
that they weren't
prime colors, so by trial and error many colors were mixed and tried.
This is the extent that the Mito Nikon engineers went to in trying
to manufacture
as
faithful a duplication of the original SP as was possible.
|
||||||||
From 0001 to 2500 Without Skipping Numbers The times dictated a relentless push towards digital. Nikon also put its main efforts into developing digital SLRs. Most likely, this would be the last time this kind of camera from times gone by would be reissued. This thought was not only prevalent at Mito Nikon, but also at factories that had supported Mito Nikon for many years. Despite the difficulty experienced in marking the serial number on the top plate of the S3, when the SP was shipped, they were numbered in continuous order from 0001 to 2500. Naturally, with the S3 reissue experience behind them there was no doubt that the proficiency level of each technician was very high, but even still, to ship 2500 cameras and lenses all numbered consequtively was very difficult. And even at Tochigi Nikon who was in charge of manufacturing the lens, you can imagine the nerve-wracking time they must have had. Especially
camera no. 0001 that was scheduled to be donated to the Japan Camera Museum,
that to be on the safe side five different 0001 cameras were
manufactured, and from the five only one was chosen and shipped. By the
way, of the five cameras apparently only two were fully assembled. There
was no
change in the fact that mass production was very difficult. Mito Nikon asked the subcontractor company for the self timer diagrams, and to their surprise the subcontractor company gave them the self timer diagrams plus the special tools required all for free. The subcontractor company also introduced all its subcontractors. It is an extremely unusual case for a maker to offer all their know-how about a particular product without any compensation. This only occurred
because the engineers at the subcontractor company could relate with their
counterparts at Mito Nikon, and fully understood
the
significance of the project and the importance of passing on their skills. | ||||||||
Assembly Took 10 Times Longer Than the FM3A The SP reissue model production line was located next to the line where the FM3A was manufactured. Just like with the S3 reissue model, there was no belt conveyer line, rather when one technician finished their task they handed the camera to the next technician so they could perform their assigned task. At the start, 20 people worked to produce 13 units per day. Of course, with the S3 experience behind them the skill level of the technicians was very high, but compared to the S3, including the finder there was 30% more tasks required in assembly. And to make matters worse, assembly of the finder was very difficult and took 50% longer than the S3 finder. Compared to the FM3A being assembled right next door, assembly took 10 times longer. One major
problem during finder assembly was dust and particles. Once dust or a particle
finds its way inside, it appears much larger in the finder.
Considerable effort was given to rethinking each process to prevent particles
from entering the inside the camera body, even to the extent of adding
steps to the assembly process just to clean off any particles. For example,
technicians
took actions such as placing partly assembled components in containers
with lids before passing them down the line, and once the component was
assembled
it was placed back in its sealed container. The SP reissue model represents great thoroughness and devotion to the art of making something by hand. Mito Nikon felt great pride in the fact that they were able to create something even better than the original. We can certainly say that this camera is chock full of the feeling of something made by hand. After the project
finished we asked the staff at Mito Nikon who were the central core of the
manufacturing line they replied with
comments
like "I was very happy to be directly involved with this camera
that represents the origins of Nikon. Taking on the challenge of something
meant to be impossible. This is the kind of project that touches the
soul of an engineer", and casually made comments that say it all,
such as "If you hold one, I think you'll understand its worth". |
||||||||
Nikon SP Reissue Model
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
www.nikon.co.jp/main/eng/...ucture.htm Tochigi Nikon Corporation www.tochigi-nikon.co.jp/ (no English page) Mito Nikon Corporation www.mitonikon.co.jp/ (no English page) Nikon Photo Products Inc. www.nikon-image.com/jpn/index.htm (link to English page at top) It states on Mito Nikon's homepage that its a 100% Nikon owned subsidiary, but there is no such information on either the Tochigi Nikon or Nikon Photo Products Inc. homepages. That may mean Nikon has a controlling stake rather than full ownership in those companies. | ||||||||